<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Thornton said no to medical marijuana</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tonysrants.com/denver/why-thornton-said-no-to-medical-marijuana/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tonysrants.com/denver/why-thornton-said-no-to-medical-marijuana/</link>
	<description>Thornton and Denver Colorado Politics, News and Views</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:30:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Hansen</title>
		<link>http://www.tonysrants.com/denver/why-thornton-said-no-to-medical-marijuana/comment-page-1/#comment-928</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Hansen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 04:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tonysrants.com/?p=1343#comment-928</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll drop the issue after this post since I like this site and don&#039;t want to harp on the issue.  One hates to be a contrarian.

Yes, the 2005 decision by the Supreme Court supports the assertion that federal law trumps state law.  So as a practical matter if the federal government enforces the Controlled Substances Act then you could be arrested for medical use of cannabis in Colorado.

However, Holder&#039;s DOJ has made it clear it does not intend to enforce the Act in states in which cannabis is legal for medical use.

In Colorado it is legal by Amendment.  Given that the DOJ currently intends to honor local laws it follows that it is effectively legal.  

That is, citing the true fact that the CSA is still on the federal books does not stop a resident of Thornton with a prescription from purchasing cannabis from a variety of dispensaries in the Denver area this very week.  That is the reality on the ground.

There may be many arguments against allowing medical dispensaries in Thornton but the argument that it is &quot;illegal&quot; just does not hold water at this point.

And in fact the argument made in the article is not that cannabis is illegal but rather that rogue physicians are handing out prescriptions to healthy people.  

My original point is that there are laws on the books to handle physicians who abuse the power of prescription.  We don&#039;t stop handing out prescriptions for codeine simply because some physicians overprescribe it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll drop the issue after this post since I like this site and don&#8217;t want to harp on the issue.  One hates to be a contrarian.</p>
<p>Yes, the 2005 decision by the Supreme Court supports the assertion that federal law trumps state law.  So as a practical matter if the federal government enforces the Controlled Substances Act then you could be arrested for medical use of cannabis in Colorado.</p>
<p>However, Holder&#8217;s DOJ has made it clear it does not intend to enforce the Act in states in which cannabis is legal for medical use.</p>
<p>In Colorado it is legal by Amendment.  Given that the DOJ currently intends to honor local laws it follows that it is effectively legal.  </p>
<p>That is, citing the true fact that the CSA is still on the federal books does not stop a resident of Thornton with a prescription from purchasing cannabis from a variety of dispensaries in the Denver area this very week.  That is the reality on the ground.</p>
<p>There may be many arguments against allowing medical dispensaries in Thornton but the argument that it is &#8220;illegal&#8221; just does not hold water at this point.</p>
<p>And in fact the argument made in the article is not that cannabis is illegal but rather that rogue physicians are handing out prescriptions to healthy people.  </p>
<p>My original point is that there are laws on the books to handle physicians who abuse the power of prescription.  We don&#8217;t stop handing out prescriptions for codeine simply because some physicians overprescribe it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger C</title>
		<link>http://www.tonysrants.com/denver/why-thornton-said-no-to-medical-marijuana/comment-page-1/#comment-926</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 00:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tonysrants.com/?p=1343#comment-926</guid>
		<description>As has been stated many times, federal law trumps state law.  That is a fact and there is no way around that.  If the two are in conflict, federal law winds.  Marijuana is illegal in the United States and thus it is illegal in Colorado - no matter what Colorado voters want.  If medical marijuana advocates want to change they law, they need to take it up with Congress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As has been stated many times, federal law trumps state law.  That is a fact and there is no way around that.  If the two are in conflict, federal law winds.  Marijuana is illegal in the United States and thus it is illegal in Colorado &#8211; no matter what Colorado voters want.  If medical marijuana advocates want to change they law, they need to take it up with Congress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Hansen</title>
		<link>http://www.tonysrants.com/denver/why-thornton-said-no-to-medical-marijuana/comment-page-1/#comment-922</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Hansen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 06:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tonysrants.com/?p=1343#comment-922</guid>
		<description>Actually according to the state of Colorado (as voted by it citizens) if a person has a prescription for the medical use of marijuana then it is legal.  That is the key thing and even if Thornton disapproves of dispensaries it will stay legal.

If a physician is abusing his power of prescription then there are known standard means to handle the problem.

Some people are being intentionally dense on this issue because at heart they don&#039;t like the amendment.  But let&#039;s not pretend that we&#039;ve never seen rogue physicians handing out too many prescriptions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually according to the state of Colorado (as voted by it citizens) if a person has a prescription for the medical use of marijuana then it is legal.  That is the key thing and even if Thornton disapproves of dispensaries it will stay legal.</p>
<p>If a physician is abusing his power of prescription then there are known standard means to handle the problem.</p>
<p>Some people are being intentionally dense on this issue because at heart they don&#8217;t like the amendment.  But let&#8217;s not pretend that we&#8217;ve never seen rogue physicians handing out too many prescriptions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger C</title>
		<link>http://www.tonysrants.com/denver/why-thornton-said-no-to-medical-marijuana/comment-page-1/#comment-911</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tonysrants.com/?p=1343#comment-911</guid>
		<description>Not at all.  The key thing is that marijuana is illegal and even if Thornton made it an &#039;allowed use&#039; it would still be illegal.  With no regulations in place from the state and the Federal law in conflict, Thornton did the right thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not at all.  The key thing is that marijuana is illegal and even if Thornton made it an &#8216;allowed use&#8217; it would still be illegal.  With no regulations in place from the state and the Federal law in conflict, Thornton did the right thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael T.</title>
		<link>http://www.tonysrants.com/denver/why-thornton-said-no-to-medical-marijuana/comment-page-1/#comment-904</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tonysrants.com/?p=1343#comment-904</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t this a little like throwing the baby out with the bathwater?  If a liquor store owner is caught selling booze to a minor, should we ban beer?  If a guy without a gun license kills someone with a gun, should we ban guns?  Of course not.  There&#039;s a double standard at play here and it&#039;s purely motivated by politics and so-called family values.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t this a little like throwing the baby out with the bathwater?  If a liquor store owner is caught selling booze to a minor, should we ban beer?  If a guy without a gun license kills someone with a gun, should we ban guns?  Of course not.  There&#8217;s a double standard at play here and it&#8217;s purely motivated by politics and so-called family values.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

